Writers boycott NLB event over book ban
NLB's Read! Fest event cancelled after writers withdraw following books ban
The local literary community was vocal in its uproar over the National Library Board's (NLB) decision to withdraw three children's books.
And some of them decided to act - by withdrawing from an NLB event. All four decided to boycott the event tomorrow afternoon at the Central Public Library.
TV writer Prem Anand, a panellist of the Read! Fest event, Humour is Serious Business, said the group made the decision after a discussion yesterday morning. The other panellists are lawyer/novelist Adrian Tan, poet/author Felix Cheong and novelist/poet Gwee Li Sui.
Mr Prem said: "We had a consensus that such a unilateral decision by the NLB was not right. Personally, I don't understand why the NLB is reacting to the objection of a minority."
An NLB spokesman said that it was saddened by the group's withdrawal.
"NLB has organised collaborative events with some of these authors and there has been much interest. The 77 participants who have signed up for the programme would be disappointed.
"We are contacting the participants to inform them of the cancellation. Moving forward, we still welcome these authors to work with us."
The boycott follows the call from several members of the literary scene to reconsider their association with the NLB after it withdrew the books And Tango Makes Three, The White Swan Express and Who Is In My Family after complaints that they did not promote the right family values.
The NLB said yesterday that the withdrawn books would be pulped.
SOLIDARITY
Poet/playwright Alfian Saat called for the "collective action by Singapore writers" on his Facebook page yesterday.
He said: "We can boycott NLB events, dissociate ourselves from the NLB. And instead of hiding behind a vague 'pro-family' stand, our stand is precise and clear: we are against censorship, an opaque bureaucracy and the destruction of books."
MP Baey Yam Keng, who is the deputy chairman for the Government Parliamentary Committee of Communications and Information, said the reaction of the community is "understandable".
"They are passionate and feel that the recent controversy does not respect the art of writing and how literature can be an expression of different views."
But Mr Baey said the community should give the NLB an opportunity to explain itself, especially its processes.
Mr Zaqy Mohamad, chairman for the GPC of Communications and Information, called for writers to take a more "constructive" role, like helping the NLB improve its processes and guidelines for book selection
"As writers, they are able to better interpret the ambiguities and sensitivities of various works. They can also help to create awareness and promote literature as a way to explore new ideas and to broaden horizons."
Local writer/poet Alvin Pang, the moderator of an upcoming event, SG Author Series: Suchen Christine Lim, said he and Ms Lim will not be withdrawing from this event in August.
Mr Pang, also an NLB Read! Singapore featured author, was against the withdrawal of the children's books.
He said: "We must learn to accept differences in society rather than pretend they don't exist. Libraries play a role in doing that.
"It's a matter of whether we can do more good continuing with the event and speaking about these issues. As a children's books assessor, Suchen has a lot to say on censorship and about her working experience."
We had a consensus that such a unilateral decision by the NLB was not right. Personally, I don't understand why the NLB is reacting to the objection of a minority.
- TV writer Prem Anand, one of the four panellists of the Read! Fest event, Humour Is Serious Business
DECISION IN LINE WITH THE NORMS
Communications and Information Minister Yaacob Ibrahim (above) explained the Government's stand on the withdrawal of the children's books in a Facebook post yesterday. He gave these reasons:
- The withdrawal was not based on a single complaint, without an attempt to assess the merits of the complaint. The National Library Board (NLB) has a process where its officers carefully consider such feedback before making a decision.
- The decision applies only to the children's section in the public libraries. The NLB is not deciding what books children can or cannot read. That decision remains with the parents, as it always has been. People can buy these titles for their children if they wish.
- The NLB's decision was guided by community norms. Public libraries serve the community and it is right that they give consideration to community norms.
NORMS
The prevailing norms, which the overwhelming majority of Singaporeans accept, support teaching children about conventional families, but not about alternative, non-traditional families, which is what the books in question are about.
This approach is shared between all public agencies dealing with the education and care of young Singaporeans.
He said: "Like in other societies, there is considerable effort by some in Singapore to shift these norms, and equally strong pushback by those who don't wish to see change.
"Societies are never static, and will change over time. But NLB's approach is to reflect existing social norms, and not to challenge or seek to change them."
Morality v secular ethics
From drawing rousing support from the "pro-family" camp to expressions of surprise and protest from the "pro-choice" camp, the National Library Board's (NLB) decision to withdraw and pulp three children's storybooks has drawn much confusion as to what is acceptable in secular Singapore.
On one hand, it is understandable that some parents would want certain books removed from the library because these books espouse values that are contrary to their own, and so their children should not get their hands on the books.
Even if some may argue that such parents have a choice of not allowing their children to borrow these books, it cannot be ignored that some parents sometimes leave their children in public libraries, either by themselves or with their foreign domestic workers, while they run errands.
They want their children to be protected from being influenced in a subtle way by values contrary to the ones held by themselves.
But still, not getting your children to talk about what they had read in the library and not asking if they needed clarification on anything they had read is bad parenting.
CONTROVERSY
The controversy generated by the withdrawal of the children's books by NLB mirrors other recent controversies - the Wear White versus Pink Dot movement and the campaigns for and against the repeal of Section 377A, the law that criminalises sex between men.
These controversies were deemed important enough for even religious leaders to wade into, so as to provide better clarity to their own congregants.
It is indeed right for religious leaders to provide better direction on matters that concern morality to their believers.
But wading into such arguments by religious leaders also has the potential to muddy the waters further as to what is a moral issue versus what is a matter of public policy, especially when such leaders are not careful with how they articulate such views and to whom they are directed at.
There is certainly a difference between morality and secular ethics, and if we do not properly distinguish between the two, we may undermine the secular basis of our nation.
This is why it is important for NLB to make a clear stand on this issue.
In 1958, segregationists alleging that the book The Rabbit's Wedding promotes racial integration and interracial marriages sought to have it banned in Alabama in the US.
The director of the library in the southern state, upon reviewing the book, found that it had no objectionable content.
She determined that it was her ethical duty to defend the book against an outright ban. The book was eventually placed in special reserve shelves in the state library.
ALTERNATIVE
If the NLB felt that the books presented issues of sexuality to children who are too young to understand them, it could have decided to place them in a restricted section of the children's library, allowing only parents to check them out, instead of withdrawing the books from its libraries and pulping them.
In its media statement about why it decided to take down the books, the NLB explained that age-appropriateness and value-appropriateness (as determined by the Government) were its criteria for making that decision.
As far as science is concerned, the Government has determined the theory of evolution as opposed to creation theory is what would be taught to students in our public schools.
And yet, we find books that support creation theory such as And God Created Squash: How The World Began by Martha Whitmore Hickman available to children in our public libraries.
What criteria did the NLB use to determine that such books are appropriate for its young readers?
Ravi Philemon has been doing community work for more than 20 years. He was an editor with The Online Citizen and pens his thoughts on www.raviphilemon.net
- RAVI PHILEMON, GUEST WRITER
There is certainly a difference between morality and secular ethics, and if we do not properly distinguish between the two, we may undermine the secular basis of our nation.
- Ravi Philemon
Get The New Paper on your phone with the free TNP app. Download from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store now