MOH publishes fee benchmarks for common surgical procedures
Fee benchmarks for 222 common surgical procedures by private surgeons here, such as hip replacement and colonoscopy, were published online yesterday by the Ministry of Health (MOH) on its website.
The move is part of government measures to boost transparency and rein in rising healthcare costs, and comes after MOH accepted recommendations from the Fee Benchmarks Advisory Committee.
Committee chairman, Dr Lim Yean Teng, said the fee guidelines are aimed at enabling private sector healthcare providers to set appropriate charges.
The guidelines can also be used by insurers to make their products and claims processes clearer and smoother for patients.
However, healthcare providers do not need to adhere to the charges stipulated in the guidelines.
While doctors who charge more than the benchmarks may not be overcharging, the committee said they should inform the patient and insurer before the surgery is performed.
Explaining why some surgeons may charge fees higher than what is recommended, Dr Lim, a cardiologist in private practice who had worked in the public sector for 24 years, said: "For example, a patient may have underlying kidney failure or heart disease, and you have to do extra monitoring and the surgery may have to be done under certain conditions."
Fee benchmarks aimed at reining in rising costs
The introduction of surgical fee benchmarks is the latest in a series of government measures to rein in rising healthcare costs, the Health Ministry said.
Last year, quality and cost benchmarking for the public healthcare sector were introduced, while the co-payment scheme for new Integrated Shield Plan riders kicks in next year.
Healthcare costs have risen sharply over the last decade, especially in the private sector.
The average total in-patient bill in the private sector has gone up by 9 per cent each year from 2007 to 2017 - almost double the 4.9 per cent rise in the public sector's Class A wards.
Other key factors, including an ageing population, increasing healthcare usage and medical inflation, also contributed to national healthcare spending rising from $11.4 billion in 2011 to $20.7 billion in 2016.
MOH announced last year that it would be introducing fee benchmarks and appointed an independent committee in January to develop an approach.
The calls for fee benchmarks came from the medical community itself, which followed the withdrawal in 2007 of the Singapore Medical Association's (SMA) guidelines.
SMA's guidelines were withdrawn because of anti-competitive concerns, which were confirmed by the Competition Commission of Singapore in 2010.
However, the new guidelines will not run afoul of anti-competition laws as they are backed by the Health Ministry.
The introduction of fee guidelines was also a key recommendation of the Health Insurance Task Force report in 2016 to improve the transparency of medical costs here.
One of the more prominent cases of overcharging by private specialists was surgeon Susan Lim's bill for seven months of cancer treatment in 2007 for a member of the Bruneian royalty, totalling $24.8 million.
The benchmarked surgical procedures cover more than 85 per cent of cases involving surgery and 75 per cent of professional fees for procedures in the private sector last year.
When determining the guidelines, the committee looked at what was charged for surgery performed for Singaporeans in the private sector last year and also incorporated SMA's 2006 fee guidelines and inflation.
It also considered other factors such as the complexity of the surgery, as well as the time, effort and expertise needed for a typical case.
The committee consulted about 120 private practice specialists, as well as regulators, insurers, the National Trades Union Congress and the Consumers Association of Singapore among other stakeholders.
Since 2003, MOH has published information on the total hospital bill size on its website and in 2014 expanded this to include total operation fees.
Senior Minister of State for Health and Transport, Dr Lam Pin Min, told the media on Monday that it would probably take the committee three to five years to review and update the fee benchmarks.
The committee will decide on the scope of the next review within one to two years and consider including in the guidelines other charges such as consultation and anaesthetist fees.
FOR MORE, READ THE STRAITS TIMES TODAY