Extent of US-China trade fight depends on Trump’s goals
Any move by Trump to force major changes to Chinese industrial policies will come at a cost to America
How bad will the US-China trade fight get?
That depends on whether President Donald Trump will settle for a reduction in China's US trade surplus or hold out for sweeping changes to China's industrial policies.
After Mr Trump's announcement on Thursday that he will impose tariffs on up to US$60 billion (S$78b) worth of Chinese goods and impose investment restrictions on Beijing, it is unclear what his endgame is, experts say.
Mr Trump repeated last week that he wants a US$100 billion reduction in China's trade surplus, while his top trade negotiator, Mr Robert Lighthizer, said fundamental changes that allow US companies to keep their technological edge over Chinese competitors were critical to the future of the US economy.
A deal for the latter will not come in the next 45 days before the yet-to-be published US tariff list becomes effective.
"It's not clear what the Trump administration's bottom line is," said Mr Scott Kennedy, the head of China studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
"We know what the Chinese bottom line is. They won't do anything to relent on their industrial policy system," he said.
Mr Kennedy said a deal to cut China's US$375 billion US goods trade surplus by US$100 billion is far easier to achieve with additional purchases of US soybeans, beef, liquefied natural gas, Boeing aircraft and other equipment.
But fundamental changes such as joint venture requirements that often cannot be negotiated without technology transfers and industrial policies aimed at acquiring and investing in more US technology firms will not come without significant protracted pressure on China - and economic pain for the US.
"The Chinese will want to throw us a few bones and otherwise go back to the status quo. If you're talking about changing Chinese behaviour, it's a long, painful process," said Mr Derek Scissors, a China trade expert at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington.
It also would take a lot more than tariffs on US$60 billion worth of exports from China to inflict significant pain on the government, Mr Scissors said.
China's goods exports to the US rose by US$43 billion last year alone. And the US demand for Chinese goods is expected to increase in the next few years as US tax cuts boost growth and increase federal borrowing.
China's ambassador to the US, Mr Cui Tiankai, declined to rule out cutting purchases of US Treasury debt in the dispute, telling Bloomberg Television last week: "We are looking at all options."
China owned US$1.17 trillion in Treasuries at the end of January, compared with US$14.8 trillion in total US public debt, according to US Treasury data.
China has also hinted at cutting imports of US soybeans, which totalled US$12.4 billion this year - the second largest US export to China after commercial aircraft.
Beijing is likely waiting for Mr Trump's final tariff list before it responds fully.
A tit-for-tat escalation of trade retaliation, coupled with Mr Trump's desire to "look tough on China" will make it harder for the two sides to settle their differences, said Mr Eswar Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell University.
"The hardening stance on both sides, and an unclear game plan in terms of the objectives and end game the Trump administration is striving toward, makes negotiations even more complicated," Mr Prasad said.- REUTERS