Malaysia freezes $473m in PetroSaudi's UK funds linked to 1MDB
KUALA LUMPUR A Malaysian court yesterday granted an interim order to stop Saudi energy firm PetroSaudi International (PSI) from using more than US$340 million (S$473 million) in funds in Britain, which Malaysian prosecutors believe was siphoned from state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
US and Malaysian authorities said about US$4.5 billion was stolen from 1MDB in an elaborate scheme that spanned the globe and implicated former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak and US bank Goldman Sachs, among others. Najib has denied wrongdoing.
In February, three units of Goldman Sachs pleaded not guilty in a Malaysian court to charges of misleading investors regarding US$6.5 billion in bond sales the US investment bank helped raise for 1MDB.
High court Judge Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali imposed a temporary freeze on the funds in Britain held by PetroSaudi, which has links to the Saudi royal family, pending the outcome of an Aug 28 hearing on an application by Malaysian prosecutors seeking an order to prohibit the company and four others from accessing it.
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), which filed the application under anti-money laundering legislation, said it would extend the interim order to British authorities through mutual legal assistance to ensure the assets remain frozen until the court comes to a decision on the case.
The Free Malaysia Today news site quoted a lawyer for the MACC, Mr Muhammad Nizamuddin Abdul Hamid, as saying Britain's National Crime Agency (NCA) had advised Malaysian authorities to seek a Malaysian court order so the NCA could enforce it there.
Others named in the application were PSI co-founder Tarek Obaid; PetroSaudi Oil Services (Venezuela); Clyde & Co LLP, which is holding US$500 million of PetroSaudi funds in escrow; and an account under the name Temple Fiduciary Services, which Malaysian prosecutors say allegedly belongs to Tarek.
Lawyers representing Tarek and PetroSaudi Oil Services opposed the order in court.
They declined to comment on their clients' position on the case when approached by reporters outside the court. - REUTERS